Use Case Based Access Model – AI Governance

AIGN Circle operates strictly on a use-case basis. Access is not general, ongoing, or subscription-driven.
It is activated only when a concrete AI governance situation requires accountable human judgment.

AIGN Circle is engaged when responsibility becomes explicit — not before.

The Use Case

Responsibility

Why access exists at all

AI governance becomes real only when a person must be able to stand behind a decision — personally and organisationally.

AIGN Circle is activated when:

  • accountability cannot be absorbed by process alone
  • responsibility cannot be deferred or delegated
  • governance decisions carry regulatory, organisational, or reputational consequences

Use cases typically include:

  • time-critical AI system classification
  • escalation or accountability decisions
  • regulatory or audit findings
  • governance gaps during organisational transition
  • board-level responsibility questions

AIGN Circle does not respond to interest.
It responds to responsibility .mework — but it does require governance maturity and judgment.

Responsibility: Human Accountability

Access

How responsibility is activated

Only once a specific use case is clearly defined, AIGN Circle assesses:

  • whether access is appropriate at all
  • which individual or individuals are relevant for this exact context

There is:

  • no generic matching
  • no standing pool
  • no availability logic

Professionals are introduced because the use case requires their judgment —
not because they are visible, listed, or “on the market”.

Access is:

  • precise, not broad
  • contextual, not generic
  • time-bound, not ongoing

Access is activated by necessity, not exploration.

Access: Controlled Access

Trust

Why the model works

The use-case-based access model ensures:

  • precision over volume
  • responsibility over convenience
  • trust over transaction

By design, AIGN Circle:

  • avoids commoditisation
  • prevents comparison and ranking
  • protects reputations on all sides
  • separates access from delivery, tools, and incentives

Trust is not claimed. It is engineered through restraint.

Trust: Engineered Trust

Use Cases — For Organisations

AIGN Circle is relevant for organisations when governance decisions cannot be delayed, delegated, or absorbed by process alone.

Typical organisational use cases

AIGN Circle is used when:

  • internal AI governance roles are missing, unclear, or temporarily unavailable
  • AI Act classification or readiness decisions are time-critical
  • audits, regulatory reviews, or incidents escalate
  • organisations expand across jurisdictions with incompatible governance regimes
  • accountability must be assumed immediately at executive or board level

What organisations gain

Through AIGN Circle, organisations gain:

  • targeted, contextual access to governance-ready professionals
  • immediate orientation under time pressure
  • clarity on responsibility and decision scope
  • reduced reputational and sourcing risk

How access manifests

Access through AIGN Circle may result in:

  • focused expert calls (60–90 minutes)
  • executive or board-level briefings
  • second opinions and strategic sparring
  • interim or transition responsibility where appropriate

Precision is prioritised over process.
Responsibility is prioritised over duration.

Use Cases — For AI Governance Professionals

AIGN Circle is designed for professionals who already carry responsibility in real-world governance contexts.

Typical professional contexts
AIGN Circle is relevant for professionals who:

  • are asked to stand behind high-impact AI governance decisions
  • operate in regulated, multi-jurisdictional environments
  • are called into escalation, transition, or accountability moments
  • seek legitimacy without self-promotion
  • reject hype-driven visibility and performance pressure

What AIGN Circle provides
For professionals, AIGN Circle provides:

  • positioning as a trusted governance reference
  • contextual access to high-responsibility situations
  • legitimacy based on judgment and experience
  • protection from commoditisation and comparison

AIGN Circle does not promise:

  • continuous work
  • guaranteed engagements
  • visibility or reach
  • project pipelines

It offers legitimacy and reference — not volume.

Final Clarification

AIGN Circle is:

  • use-case-activated
  • context-driven
  • responsibility-centred
  • independent of delivery and tooling
  • clearly separated from consulting and recruitment logic

It exists for the moment when someone must be able to say:

“I stand behind this AI governance decision.”

When that moment comes,
AIGN Circle provides access to the people who can carry it.